Wednesday, 1 October 2008

Interpretation of International Humanitarian Law

Still catching up on recent Court judgments, allow me to highlight a recent Grand Chamber decision of the Court. In Korbely v. Hungary the Court found a violation of Article 7 ECHR (no punishment without law) by eleven votes to six. The applicant had participated in quelling a riot in Hungary during the failed 1956 revolution against the communist rulers. He was the captain of a squad that killed a number of people, some of which were armed. To summarise the decision in one sentence: the Court concluded that Korbely's acts did not satisfy all the elements of a crime against hmunanity as valid at that time. The dissenting opinions focus, amongst others, on interpretations of international humanitarian law, the validity of which I will leave to experts in that field. Once again, the judgments shows the difficulties confronting a human rights court when venturing into neighbouring fields of international law.

2 comments:

bathmate said...

That’s looks so nice your posting.
Everything looks good in your posting.
That will be necessary for all. Thanks for your posting.
Bathmate

Personal Injury Attorney Houston said...

Some modifications should be made in such laws so that such cases can become more transparent.